![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|   |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
PostWhoringMod
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: From Chicago, missing Madison, WI
Shoots With: Canon
Flickr: AltOnePhoto
Posts: 964
![]() ![]() |
Tokina and Tamron's seem to be decent (had both before). I try and stick with Manuf. lenses when financially possible though.
__________________
Apple/BMW/Canon snob
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
PhotoN00B
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Shoots With: Canon 20D, Sigma 24-70 f/2.8
Flickr: arcer63
Posts: 29
![]() |
sigma 24-70 f/2.8 here. I think that as long as you buy one of the higher end ones you are still good, although the image quality might not be there on every shot. not that they are bad, they just require a little more sharpening, like very little more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Night Sh1ft
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Shoots With: 5D MKII
Flickr: AutoPhotog
Posts: 509
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
cant say ive used it personally, but have a friend who has one and loves it
worst case scenario you return it?? 14 days
__________________
A turbo: exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster. Canon 24-70 F2.8 L : Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS/L : Canon 5D Mark II : B+W Filters : Photo Whore
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
PhotoN00B
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Shoots With: Canon 20D, Sigma 24-70 f/2.8
Flickr: arcer63
Posts: 29
![]() |
The thing I really loved was having the extra 750 dollars after purchasing the 24-70 f/2.8 by sigma. i almost could have purchased their 70-200 f/2.8 as well for the price of the canon 24-70 L lens.
although if i had the money, i would have gotten the L in a heartbeat, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
PhotoN00B
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
![]() |
Quote:
Yea if the price difference was smaller then I would have easily spent more to get the Canon L-lens. But yikes, the price difference was almost $800! Think it would be overkill for my needs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
PhotoFreak
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 112
![]() |
i got the sigma 10-20 and the sigma 24-70 2.8. i love both and definitely happy wiht them. got both for the price of a canon 24-70 lol
__________________
--Canon 40d--Sigma 24-70 2.8--Sigma 10-20--Canon 50 1.8--Canon 75-300--Vivitar 285--Custom Car Mount Rig--
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
PhotoN00B
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Shoots With: Canon
Flickr: j.owen.smith
Posts: 17
![]() |
Sigma 70-200 Macro II here. Actually I have two of them. I really only notice the difference wide open. Since I am usually using it for automotive I barely ever need to shoot it wide open so there are no issues. IQ is great.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |