|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
10-27-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
PhotoLover
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Shoots With: Canon 40D, Canon EF 28-135 ,Canon EF 50mm
Posts: 82
  |
Noob from OKC
Hey everyone, names Jason
been a photographer on the side for a year and a half. First started out doing Car Shows then started to do "Model Photography", and did one Wedding. Im using a Canon 40D, i have two lenses; Canon EF 28-135 and a Canon EF 50mm. I plan on buying a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM and a Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM in the near future. Other than that thanks for having me on the fourm, so far i like it. here are a couple pics      
|
|
|
|
10-27-2009, 08:19 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Night Sh1ft
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Shoots With: 5D MKII
Flickr: AutoPhotog
Posts: 509
 |
nice shots!!
looks like your future basket of gear will be a fun time  that 85mm lens is unreal...the 16-35 is okay from my usage at least...not sure that I love it on FF? have had better results with the 24-70 to be honest...but I am looking to pick up the 14mm 2.8 L II at some point for the real wide shots
__________________
A turbo: exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster. Canon 24-70 F2.8 L : Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS/L : Canon 5D Mark II : B+W Filters : Photo Whore
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2009, 09:24 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
PostWhoringMod
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: From Chicago, missing Madison, WI
Shoots With: Canon
Flickr: AltOnePhoto
Posts: 964
|
^ I'm with Stoopid
I have the 16-35mm on my 40d... its excellent but on a Mk II full frame you'll want something not as wide for a walk around lens. The 16 is REALLY wide on the full frame. 24-70mm is the one to go with for sure.
__________________
Apple/BMW/Canon snob
  |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
 |
 |
Linear Mode
